Thursday, September 1, 2011

Static vs. dynamic languages: Why choose one over the other | TechRepublic

Static vs. dynamic languages: Why choose one over the other | TechRepublic
Takeaway: A discussion with Chip Camden and Justin James about static and dynamic languages leads to talk of Haskell, refactoring, code contracts, and more.
We asked TechRepublic contributors Chip Camden and Justin James to sound off on why they would choose static languages or dynamic languages over the other. Read what the developers had to say about static vs. dynamic (and to clarify, by a “static language,” they mean “statically typed language”) in this back-and-forth email discussion, and then weigh in on this topic by posting to our forums.
Learn You a Haskell for Great Good!: A Beginner's Guide Real World Haskell Programming in Haskell

No comments:

Post a Comment